Showing posts with label The Development of Economic Doctrine: An Introductory Survey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Development of Economic Doctrine: An Introductory Survey. Show all posts

Saturday, November 17, 2018

Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk's Theory of the Determination of Price by "Marginal Pairs"

There are, however, two points in Böhm-Bawerk's doctrine to which reference is frequently made, and which may therefore be briefly noted here. One is his theory that price is determined by what he calls the "marginal pairs"; the other is represented by his views on interest, a subject which he describes as the" heavy part" of his leading work.

The theory of the determination of price by the so-called "marginal pairs" is to be found in the concluding portions of Böhm-Bawerk's discussion of "price," in which up to a point he shrouds obvious truth behind considerable complexity of statement. In the case of isolated exchange the price will be "determined somewhere between the subjective valuation of the commodity by the buyer as upper limit, and the subjective valuation by the seller as lower limit." Putting it in everyday language, in the isolated exchange the buyer will not pay more than he thinks the thing is worth, nor will the seller sell for less than he, on his side, thinks it is worth, and the actual price will fall between these two limits.

--Alexander Gray, The Development of Economic Doctrine: An Introductory Survey (1931; repr., London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1956), 357.



Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk's "Capital and Interest" Is an Elaborate Criticism of All Earlier Theories of Interest

The third of the great Austrians who form the core of the Austrian school is Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1851-1914), perhaps the best known in this country, by reason of his theories regarding interest, and his very brilliant assault on the Marxian system. For our immediate purposes, Böhm-Bawerk is the author of two considerable works, both of which have fortunately been translated, one under the title of Capital and Interest, and the other as The Positive Theory of Capital. The former is an elaborate criticism of all earlier theories of interest, so that the work is in substance a very learned and detailed history of economic doctrine on this one point. This work is wholly destructive and critical and though it prepares the way for a statement of the author's own views, it does not in fact contain such a statement. It is to its companion work, The Positive Theory of Capital, that we must tum to get Böhm-Bawerk's contribution to Austrian doctrine.

--Alexander Gray, The Development of Economic Doctrine: An Introductory Survey (1931; repr., London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1956), 356.