The control of corruption is of vital interest in any free and democratic society. An important goal of prohibition is the reduction of
corruption. Timberlake (1963) claims that political corruption by the alcohol industry was the major reason for establishing Prohibition:
"Like many other businesses, the liquor industry sought to influence
or control all levels of government in order to promote its interests and to protect itself against unfavorable legislation. But unlike most businesses, it had a special reason to engage in politics: no other
enterprise paid such high taxes or contributed such large sums to
government" (106). Prohibition seeks to reduce corruption in both
the specific sense of the bribery of public officials and in the general
sense of maintaining individual integrity, virtue, and moral principles. Experience, however, shows that, on the contrary, the corruption of public officials increases. As Mises notes, "Unfortunately the
office-holders and their staffs are not angelic. They learn very soon
that their decisions mean for the businessmen either considerable
losses or—sometimes—considerable gains. Certainly there are also
bureaucrats who do not take bribes; but there are others who are
anxious to take advantage of any 'safe' opportunity of'sharing with
those whom their decisions favor' " (1949, 734). This corruption, in
the case of prohibition, represents a failure to achieve the goals of
prohibition and a major impediment to the enforcement of prohibition.
--Mark Thornton, The Economics of Prohibition (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1991), 126-127.
No comments:
Post a Comment