Copyright is dead. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act
("DMCA") has killed it. This does not mean that copyright
has or will become irrelevant to the protection of creative works in
this country. To the contrary, the exclusive rights set forth in Title
17 of the United States Code will continue to provide an important
source of protection for works of authorship. The term "copyright," however, means more than a system of protecting creative
works against unauthorized copying. Copyright signifies a system
of protection designed and intended primarily to serve the public
interest in the creation and dissemination of creative works, rather
than the private interest of enriching those who create and disseminate such works. Where the first is copyright, the second is
mere guild monopoly. With the enactment of the DMCA, there is a
very real danger that our system of protecting creative works will serve primarily private interests. If so, then the protection of creative works will have come full circle, from the guild monopoly of
the Stationers' Company to the guild monopoly of the DMCA, and
copyright, in the sense of protection intended primarily to serve the
public interest, will surely have died.
During the Anglo-American legal system's last experience with
guild monopoly, the Stationers' Company of London controlled
almost exclusively the publication of written works in England
from 1556 to 1694. As one might expect, and as courts from time
to time remind us, the Stationers' Company did not always, or even
usually, exercise its control over printing in a benign manner designed to advance the public welfare as a whole. To the contrary,
securing the profits of a favored few within the guild seemed to be
the Stationers' Company's guiding principle. In the end, the English Parliament was persuaded by the Company's excesses to refuse
to renew the last of the Licensing Acts through which the Company had maintained its power. A decade and a half later, those
same excesses led the English Parliament to replace guild control
with the first copyright statute, found in the 1709 Statute of Anne.
--Glynn S. Lunney Jr., "The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act," Virginia Law Review 87, no. 5 (September 2001): 814-815.
No comments:
Post a Comment