Roger Garrison's contribution to the Festschrift, “From Lachmann to Lucas:
On Institutions, Expectations, and Equilibrating Tendencies” is nothing short
of magnificent. By creating a “tendency toward equilibrium spectrum” and then
placing on it Lachmann (“never”), Mises-Hayek (“sometimes”), and Lucas
(“always”), Professor Garrison does more to elucidate the views of the Austrian,
the Rational Expectations, and the “kaleidic” schools of thought on the
equilibrating tendencies in an economy than an essay of ten thousand words
or more could have done. Through this astute and innovative feat, moreover,
the author of this chapter is able to once again establish praxeology as the
moderate and reasonable view that takes on an intermediate position between
two extremist beliefs that might otherwise have appeared more attractive than
they are.
Garrison uses Lachmann's concern with future expectations to cast doubt
on Lucas's assertion that the economy must always and ever be in equilibrium.
He mobilizes the Mises-Hayek insight that on the free market, those who are
better able to anticipate consumer demands will tend to have command over
more and more resources and thus will be able to cast a disproportionate impetus toward equilibrium. This undercuts the extreme Lachmannian skepticism
that there can be even a tendency toward equilibration.
Further, with this spectrum device, the Auburn University professor can
focus attention on the crucially important role played by institutions. The
Hayekian criticism of Keynes is that there is not enough disaggregation in this
system to allow for the equilibrating role of entrepreneurial success. But this
can only occur, shows Garrison, in a marketplace where businessmen can reap
the reward of their superior insight. Paradoxically, or perhaps not so paradoxically, Keynesian-inspired government “stabilization” measures can actually
retard movements toward equilibrium. Says Garrison: “They nullify the market
forces that give rise to equilibrating tendencies, thus causing the economy to perform in the very way that Keynes envisioned it.”
—Walter Block, review of Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann on His Eightieth Birthday, edited by Israel M. Kirzner, Review of Austrian Economics 3, no. 1 (1990): 223-224.
No comments:
Post a Comment